PowerByProxi and Minimonos in top 10 for BNZ Virgin Business Challenge

The BNZ Virgin Business Challenge awards dinner was held last Thursday night. 260 companies entered this challenge with 10 going through to the final judging phase on Wednesday and Thursday.  The finalists were competing for a $100k cash prize, international travel and time with one of the world’s leading entrepreneurs Richard Branson. MOVAC investee companies PowerByProxi (Fund 2 and 3) and Minimonos (Fund 2) made the short list.

FaceMe, an online video conferencing solution for businesses took out the award, but all 10 companies were outstanding. The NZ innovation sector is in great shape!

The interviews conducted with Greg Cross from PowerByProxi and Milessa Clark-Reynolds from MiniMonos can be seen below.  The full list of finalists can be found on the BNZ website.

 

Internet Industry Awards 2010 – open for applicatons

NEWS RELEASE

Applications are now open for the 2010 New Zealand Internet Industry Awards

Following on from the inaugural Internet Industry Awards launched in 2009 The Liz Dengate Thrush Foundation is pleased to announce that applications for the 2010 New Zealand Internet Industry Awards are now open.

These Awards are New Zealand’s premier awards focused on the Internet as an enabling platform for business, education and society enhancing organisations.

By honouring and celebrating those companies who have leveraged the transformational deliverables of the Internet the Awards seek to recognise excellence and showcase best practice to the wider community.

In addition to three company Awards launched last year The Liz Dengate Thrush Foundation has added a fourth company Award  focusing on recognising a company which has utilised the Internet to create a borderless platform for doing business. The fifth category recognises an individual - someone who is an Internet Innovator or Entrepreneur . A rare type of person who has put both capital and reputation on the line and has developed an Internet initiative that has successfully contributed to New Zealand’s wealth.

More about this year’s Categories:

Five distinct Categories have been developed to reflect the wide ranging impact of the Internet on New Zealand society . This impact can be realised at an individual, group, company or market (New Zealand or offshore) level. Applications must be from New Zealand based companies or individuals. 

Positive Societal Impact - Development of the application, product or services provided on the Internet likely to have the most beneficial impact on New Zealand society.

Best Education Product or Service on the Internet - The application, product or services provided on the Internet that is likely to have the greatest impact on learning and/or teaching in New Zealand.

Best Business Application – For those that transform their methods of doing business, or change our way of doing business with them.

Best Global Application on the Internet – For those companies that have used the fact the Internet promotes a borderless platform to do business on a global basis. This could be an internal application - the linking of country offices or an external application to reach target audiences within other geographies.

Internet Innovator or Entrepreneur – Recognition for that rare breed who put capital and reputation on the line and successfully contribute to New Zealand’s wealth.

Award winners will be announced at a black-tie dinner at Parliament’s Banquet Hall on Wednesday 28 July 2010.

To reserve your seats please contact Margie Sharpe – 021 767 530 or email Margie at margie.sharpe@xtra.co.nz

For more information visit www.internetindustryawards.co.nz or phone:

Catherine Gardiner
New Zealand Internet Industry Awards
09 361 2112
0274 899 768
catherine.gardiner@prescientmc.co.nz

Tough raising money at the moment

Make no bones about it – raising money to start or expand a business in New Zealand at the moment is tough, REALLY TOUGH. That said, the good news is that Angel Investors invested over $50million in young New Zealand Companies in 2009 (see this link, note the number is probably larger given that this is only the reported number). However, I suspect that this number is comprised, in large measure, of follow on rounds into companies that investors were already committed to.

My experience at the moment is as follows:

  1. There is very little NZ VC money available for new deals today and i don’t see this changing anytime soon. The issue for the Venture Capital community is that it has not been able to generate the exits and returns needed to build confidence with institutional investors. This is not an issue restricted to New Zealand. If you look at the AVCAL (Australian) data, VC returns have been a disaster with returns of -1.4% from 1985 – 2007  - it’s a risky game. Don’t get me wrong there is some VC money in New Zealand, but it’s not much and concentrated in too few funds. What’s left has the luxury of picking off the very best of deals with shortest return paths. Many people are working hard to rectify this issue but currently the jury is out on when we will see meaningful money return to VC.
  2. Deal swaps between investors i.e. i will look at yours if you look at mine. All investor groups up and down NZ are swapping Information Memorandums at the moment. Generally these are for Companies seeking second or third round funding and have “runs of the board”. The quality is great but view groups are going out of their current portfolios.
  3. Time to get a deal done is extending – given the volume of deals in the market at the moment it’s taking much longer to get “expressions of interest” from investor groups. Plan on a minimum of 8 weeks just to get to “YES, i want to look at you”.
  4. Angel Deals getting done – the Angel networks up and down the country appear to be still getting new deals away, this is great, but i worry that the follow on funding requirements are not being adequately considered or that the hope of an offshore funding round is still prevalent in the business strategy.
  5. Investors, more conservative, investing later – in the current environment investors are taking their time over deals and unless they form an emotional attachment to a deal they are preferring stuff that has elements of proof behind it – proven product and / or proven revenue and / or proven team.

So, what’s this all mean?

  1. Syndication is the new mantra – the only way to get deals of any size done at the moment is through syndication across investor groups. Investors need to work on their syndication relationships across the country and Ventures need to plan on raising money from multiple groups. To do this find an anchor investor and then leverage their network to raise money from other groups.
  2. Plan your follow on rounds now - the first investor group is most likely – in the current climate – to be the second investor group. Structure the investment with this in mind and make sure the investor group can do more than one round of investment – plan on at least two or three.
  3. Think very carefully about Ventures requiring more than NZ$3million to trade to profitability, after you’ve halved the revenue forecast and doubled the costs. Why NZ$3million? I think that this is pretty much the limit of syndicated private investor networks. It’s a gross generalization, clearly, their are some investors that could do more, but you could count them on one hand.
  4. Think long and hard about Asia as a market and place to raise funds – generally the word we get from the US is that VC is struggling as an asset class. However, the general feeling at the Singapore conference was that Asia was awash with cash, BUT, that this cash was in funds chasing deals US$10 million or more. So if you need significant chunks of money to fund a growth strategy focusing on Asia might not be such a bad idea.  Also, Asian consumer markets are not as mature as western markets and growing strongly.  Better to launch products on a rising tide.

Carpe Diem

OnYa Kiwi Entrepreneurs

2010 has got off to a great start!  The quality that we’re seeing in the opportunities being put in front of us is the best it’s ever been.  So good on you, Kiwi Entrepreneurs and their backers.  Typically what we’re seeing at the moment are:

  • Businesses that are up and running.  Initial product development is done, market entry is mapped out and the core team is in place.
  • Experienced business people.  Increasingly we’re seeing more experienced teams with better balance.  Better balance = people with worldly business experience working in-partnership with great product innovators.  Patience is running out in the investor community for great product people not partnered with real world business experience.
  • More realistic valuations.  I’m obviously biased here but valuations started to run away in 2008/9.  The valuations now being presented are more realistic for the stage of development of companies.  This is particularly so for companies that have been through a few rounds of investment; those that haven’t still have some interesting perspectives on valuation. The most important thing in establishing value is proof.  The more you have the stronger your position.

If you’re looking to raise capital this obviously means that the bar is being raised higher and you will need to make sure you beat the other competition in the market for money.  This means, a business (not idea) with some proof behind and a team with a track record of execution.

Raising capital is still tough but deals are getting done.  That will be the subject of my next post.

Take care.

Free Book: Invest to Exit – Tom McKaskill

Tom McKaskill is a very successful business entrepreneur and well known and respected author on the subject of building businesses for exits.  I’ve known Tom for a couple of years now and enjoyed his significant insights on the subject of Angel Investing and exit planning.  Tom has written several books which are all excellent essential reads for entrepreneurs and investors alike.  I’d strongly recommend that you take a look at them.  The two he’s making available free of charge are!

  1. The Investor Pitch – see http://www.tommckaskill.com/art_Investor_Pitch.pdf; and
  2. Invest to Exit - A pragmatic strategy for Angel and Venture Capital Investors.  Investors in early stage ventures need to focus on strategic exits if they are to achieve a high return on their investments. This book explains the characteristics of strategic value, how the investor should negotiate the investment and how they should manage the process to a strategic trade sale. The book includes a very detailed discussion on the problems of high growth ventures, the unrealistic expectations associated with IPOs and the advantages of investing in strategic value ventures. See http://www.wholesaleinvestor.com.au/public_panel/news_detail.php?id_NEW=44 or http://www.avcal.com.au/research/australian/4 or http://nzangels.com/

ENJOY!

How to address the recession

The global recession is starting to bight hard.  But recessions present great opportunities for innovation.  Anecdotally and somewhat surprisingly (for us) the companies we’ve invested in have been experiencing an uptick in inquires over the last 6-months.  This appears to have been stimulated by a far greater willingness from businesses to consider change.  Anything that can help reduce costs or stimulate demand are now being more willingly considered.  So, that’s good.

However, capital markets are drying up and early stage investors need to consider long and hard the wisdom of investing in start-ups that have large on-going capital requirements – in this environment.  The view we’re taking at the moment is to “shy away” from opportunities that we see will need more than $5m in capital to commercialise them.  The reason being that the risks associated in raising this capital have increased significantly over the last 6-months.  We want to see businesses that could be realistically bought to market without requiring a big hit from a large US Venture Capital firm.

The path-to-break-even is also extremely important in this environment.  Cash is king and demonstrating a path to early cash flow generation will be a real plus in the eyes of any early stage investor.  To manage risk we are look long and hard at whether companies have options for generating enough early stage sales to become self-sufficient (maybe not hitting the high growth points we earlier would have hoped for) but providing the opportunity to ride out the storm and be positioned for growth when the world starts to right itself.  FYI, my current view is that we’re in this for atleast another three years….i hope i’m wrong and it’s shorter.

In summary three things to think about:

  1. How does your business / opportunity provide value, to who, in a recession?
  2. Be conservative on your overall cash requirements – don’t set a plan to raise the same amount of money as Facebook or Twitter?
  3. Plot a potential path to break-even….ASAP

Repatriating talent, capital and contacts

The current turmoil in financial and business markets does have a potential upside for early stage NZ ventures - the prospect of experienced Kiwis returning and others migrating to New Zealand.

Several local recruiters are already reporting that they’re experiencing a surge in enquiries from those seeking to return or migrate from the UK and US sooner than they had planned. Many have gained specific knowledge, capital, and most importantly, contacts, from their time working overseas.

For those of you who are building (or potentially building) NZ-based businesses, such people can be critically-important resources, either as employees, advisors or investors.

On the flip side, for many of those who have worked in specialist roles overseas, there are simply no corresponding roles in NZ, hence the need to re-invent themselves to a certain extent. Others will see their migration as the chance to stop working in a traditional corporate environment. So for many, either starting a new venture or getting involved with early stage ventures will be their most likely form of business actitivity.

A logical way to try and find these returning Kiwis and new migrants are though networking events run by incubators, business groups, and professional service providers, as they themselves will be using such events to connect with what’s going on locally as well.

Just something to bear in mind for those of you seeking potential routes to specific market knowledge, investment capital and well-stocked Rolodexes.

Creating value

The inaugural angel association conference is scheduled for next week.  This conference is a great opportunity for angel investors to get together, network and share war stories.  I’ve been asked to run a session at this conference on the subject of “creating value in companies”, so i thought i’d take the opportunity to: a) get organised; and b) share some thoughts.

So here goes…”Building value in investee companies…an investors perspectives“.

Three key things to think about:

Focus early on the things you believe will create value,

Actively avoid the things that could destroy value, and

Actively manage your on-going funding needs

Things that add value

Building a business and managing your investment funding is about identifying and doing the things that create value in a business.  So, if we did an initial investment at say a valuation of $2m, we need to ask and answer the question “what do we need to do to grow the value to say $6m”.  From an investment point of view the valuation should be increasing significantly at each subsequent investment round.  So what’s the justification for value increase?  Well, it kinda depends on the idea and the industry that the business is operating in, but the things i look for are:

  1. We’ve nailed the technology / product - note i use “we” because when Movac invests we become a team and its our job to help ensure these objectives get achieved…moving on…the first investment stage should ABSOLUTELY sort out the key technology or product risks and establish that the company can produce its widgets and ideally knows how to scale production up.  Generally i take this as a given – KIWI’s are bloody good at this.
  2. We’ve protected our technology position - this is not relevant to all businesses, but patents can have significant value.  They provide a window of opportunity and protection for executing a new idea.  They also provide a basis for licensing deals. But you need to go beyond simply filing a PCT (i don’t rate PCTs without the backup) and do the real work…establish freedom to operate and commence the process of filing in your targeted market geography.  This means finding and spending the money on a good patent lawyer.
  3. We’ve passed or progressed any major regulatory hurdles - again not relevant to all businesses but fundamentally important to BioTech businesses and any physical product that is likely to run into regulatory hurdles – domestically or internationally.  Be aware that the regulatory issues in Europe are somewhat of a mind field for young NZ businesses and this will be an area that you need help with.
  4. We’ve assembled market proof - this is the stuff that, in my experience, KIWI companies are kinda crap at (gross generalisation, I know).  The strongest position that you can be in, in this regard, is that you are trading product; and/ or have signed distribution agreements; and/ or have an established pipeline of opportunities.  Leverage the support that NZTE and organisations like KEA can provide to this process.  You need to get offshore, meet people and do deals.  You need to figure out how to sell your widget globally.
  5. We know how to scale up - we’ve addressed how to scale our business, particularly manufacturing and distribution, we’ve worked out the issues associated with manufacturing at scale, we understand the support issues, we’ve worked through any compliance related issues.
  6. We’ve got a great team that’s positioned to execute - this one can not be under-rated and the worst assumption that we see made is when entrepreneurs believe they have all the skills and experience – in some cases they may have the skills but not the experience.  Having people that have been there before is absolutely invaluable and earns a BIG TICK from us.  An execution team, in our view will comprise:
    • A sales guy / gal - the person who can get out there and sell / market the sh*^te out of the product.
    • A product gal / guy - the person who knows how to make the product sing and dance.
    • A numbers guy / gal - the person who understands how the business operates in a spreadsheet.  Can articulate the implications of key decisions.
    • A strategic / management gal / guy - the person who can define and articulate long range strategy and who can recruit and build teams.
  7. We’ve got good governance in place - ideally we’ve got a functioning board with some wise, experienced heads, one or two independents directors (who have no or minor shareholding stakes) and a robust Shareholder’s agreement.  Shareholder agreements are crucial to enable effective decision making around subsequent stages of investment.

Things that destroy value

Apart from failing to achieve the things outlined above, the things that can destroy value in a business are typically the big time wasters such as:

  1. Unaligned shareholders + poor governance - a shareholder and / or director group that is not aligned around the goals for their investment (particularly timeframes for returns), confused about their roles or in openly hostile confrontation are sole destroying for a start-up.  From an investment point of view you can smell these issues a mile away.  The tend to create a corrosive culture around a business and result in lots of wasted time and distraction.  For this reason – treat you shareholders and investors well; communicate openly and regularly; work at maintaining alignment but don’t engage them in operational aspects of the business.
  2. Entrepreneurs who do not listen - the transition from entrepreneur to manager of a global $10m plus business should not be underestimated.  Entrenched entrepreneurs who are not willing to adapt their role as the business develops can be and generally are major impediments to growth.  Working through these issues consumes a lot of time and is highly demotivating for all parties concerned.
  3. Badly diluted founders - founders tend to be emotionally attached to their shareholding percentage and this can have a major impact on their on-going motivation in the business.  The tricky exercise here is managing the risk / reward equation throughout the on-going investment stages of the business.
  4. Failing to manage the investment pathway - early stage companies always run out of money.  You need to stay on top of the businesses on-going requirements for capital and actively manage where you expect this to come from.  Avoid the assumption that the initial group of shareholders will keep investing for ever; regardless of how the company is doing you can not anticipate your investor groups wider drivers and limitation on funds.  See further comments below.

Managing the investment pathway

The investment pathway is something often ignored in the business proposals that we see.  Essentially this is actively planning the capital (investment) requirements for the business and putting a plan in place to:

  1. Achieve the investment objectives (normally the same as the business objectives); and
  2. Procure the funds at the target valuation

Many early stage investors and founding entrepreneurs often ignore the impact of potential dilution rounds on their projected returns – this can become a real stumbling block to obtaining agreement on subsequent rounds of investment.  So, the better prepared that everyone is for this the better.

The capital investment plan looks at:

  1. The staging of capital - how much money is needed at each stage (each stage should provide for at least 18-months business development);
  2. The objectives to be achieved for each stage - these are the things that, if achieved, will improve the value of the business; and
  3. Where we expect the capital to come from - you  need to start your understanding and research on this early.  Most venture capital companies are upfront with their investment criteria, so you should be able to identify potential sources of capital.  The other things to explore are: what value can they add outside of money; how far through their funds they are; and their timing needs for exit – these factors will help identify the playing field for potential funding.

You need to start the dating game with potential investors very early in the process.  You should plan a “relationship development” campaign in exactly the same way you would with a potential large client.   Don’t leave it to the last minute to start this process.

If you’ve managed to do all these things, then your business is well positioned for growth and sucess – even in the current climate.

Good luck

QED (-;

Global slow-down great for Angel Investment

There’s been a lot of doom and gloom in the financial markets and the news this year.  Its been one hell of a rocky ride in the equity markets – world wide.  Companies that shouldn’t have gone bust have gone bust because they haven’t been able to access capital.  Oil shot up then fell back down.  Food prices have shot up.  The collapse of finance companies in New Zealand has sucked the life savings out of middle New Zealand.  All rather depressing really and a situation where you would expect early stage investment to have all but dried up.

BUT, completely counter-intuitively it hasn’t, in fact, there’s lots of money swashing around looking for home.  Why’s this?  A lot of High Net Worths or Angels that i talk to have retreated to cash in their investment portfolios.  This means they have cashed up their equity investments and are looking for new places to invest it.  The great thing about start-up businesses are:

  • you don’t have a schizophrenic market telling you that the value has gone down every day; and
  • you get to work with some amazing and passionate people with great ideas.

So, for all those budding entrepreneurs out there, now’s a GREAT TIME to bring your ideas forward.

Ideas worthy of investment

David, from ReelClever, sent me this interesting blog post from Paul Graham at Y Combinator.  Y Combinator’s business model for investing in start-ups is really unique and worth a look for those involved in the investment industry.  Paul’s described some of the ideas that they’d like to invest in.  The challenge for us at Movac, is to now to do likewise which we will do over the next couple of months.

Here’s 3 from Paul’s list that we’ve debated in the past and still intrigue us:

2. Simplified browsing. There are a lot of cases where you’d trade some of the power of a web browser for greater simplicity. Grandparents and small children don’t want the full web; they want to communicate and share pictures and look things up. What viable ideas lie undiscovered in the space between a digital photo frame and a computer running Firefox? If you built one now, who else would use it besides grandparents and small children?

3. New news. As Marc Andreessen points out, newspapers are in trouble. The problem is not merely that they’ve been slow to adapt to the web. It’s more serious than that: their problems are due to deep structural flaws that are exposed now that they have competitors. When the only sources of news were the wire services and a few big papers, it was enough to keep writing stories about how the president met with someone and they each said conventional things written in advance by their staffs. Readers were never that interested, but they were willing to consider this news when there were no alternatives.

News will morph significantly in the more competitive environment of the web. So called “blogs” (because the old media call everything published online a “blog”) like PerezHilton and TechCrunch are one sign of the future. News sites like Reddit and Digg are another. But these are just the beginning.

12. Fix advertising. Advertising could be made much better if it tried to please its audience, instead of treating them like victims who deserve x amount of abuse in return for whatever free site they’re getting. It doesn’t work anyway; audiences learn to tune out boring ads, no matter how loud they shout.

What we have now is basically print and TV advertising translated to the web. The right answer will probably look very different. It might not even seem like advertising, by current standards. So the way to approach this problem is probably to start over from scratch: to think what the goal of advertising is, and ask how to do that using the new ingredients technology gives us. Probably the new answers exist already, in some early form that will only later be recognized as the replacement for traditional advertising.

Bonus points if you can invent new forms of advertising whose effects are measurable, above all in sales.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 140 other followers